![]() CIC is also committed to preventing the hardship resulting from the separation of spouses and common-law partners together in Canada, where possible. ![]() An additional Appendix B has been added with additional procedures for the procedural triaging of pending cases under the public policy.ĬIC is committed to family reunification and facilitating processing in cases of genuine spouses and common-law partners already living together in Canada.Clarification has been added to indicate which clients will benefit from the refund provision if applicable and which will not.Clarification wording has been added to indicate that the Minister, via the public policy is waiving the status requirement not the officer.Clarification has been added to indicate that for persons for whom their FC1 or FCC case has been refused for being out of status, they may re-apply for H&C consideration or for consideration in the Spouse or Common-law Partner in Canada Class depending on the circumstances of their case.In the “ Appendix A: Case Type List for Application of the Public Policy”:.In Section 6 “Codes”, clarification for how to code accepted and refused cases under this public policy has been included.A section has been added explaining when the regulatory stay of removal under R233 will be invoked.A section has been added which explains what is meant by “removal ready” for the purposes of this public policy.A section has been added which explains how the sixty-day administrative deferral of removal will be calculated by Canada Border Services Agency including a section on how this timeframe will be calculated in transitional cases.The provision concerning persons who will not benefit from an administrative deferral of removal in cases where charges have been dropped, has been clarified to indicate that this provision refers to charges dropped for reasons related to effecting a removal order.This section has been clarified to indicate that reference to section 36 applies to both criminality, 36(1) and serious criminality, 36(2).In Section 5(F) “Procedures: Administrative Deferral of Removal”:.In Section 5(D) and the Appendix “Applicants who Meet Eligibility Requirements for this Public Policy” has been clarified to indicate that these clients are subject to the examination requirements in IP8 and that they will benefit from the fee remission option if applicable.In Section 5(B) “Confirmation of Sponsorship Submitted” the wording has been clarified to indicate that the submitted sponsorship is a three year sponsorship. ![]() Also, additional wording has been included to indicate that pending applications are not subject to an additional fee for consideration under the public policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |